With the election results released last night, I am
sure you would share the feeling of the people here that we are more confident
about our democracy, maturity of our people, and the prospect of stability. What
I intent to talk about today is to give you a historical overview of how
democracy developed here and democracy in action since the establishment of the
current Administration last year, as well as our agenda for the future.
Historical Overview
You may wonder whether democracy was something
rather new or foreign to the people here when the Government of the Republic of
China began its ruling in the middle of the last century. Democracy, in a
refined manner, of course, was not known to the general public then, but during
the period of Japanese-rule, which preceded the Nationalist-rule, elections at
the local-level were implemented, despite the fact that Taiwan was at that time,
a colony of Japan. It was not an unfamiliar idea for people to vote, to elect
their representatives. When the Government of the Republic of China moved here,
it continued with the elections at the local level. Unfortunately, the local
elections often intertwined with fights between local factions and sometimes
involving competition for economic resources at the local-level. In the first
thirty-years of Nationalists¡¦ rule, representation of people is limited by the
number of seats available to the local electorates at the Legislature, as the
Legislature then was composed of legislators representing different regions of
China. In other words, the will of the people here was not fully expressed and
had to be compromised with interests coming from somewhere else. But in the
1980s, the Government then continued to increase the seats available to the
representatives of the local people here, so the level of democracy improved.
The development of democracy reached a landmark when direct presidential
election was introduced in the 1990s. That was a time when people felt closer to
the political process for the selection of their political leaders. My sense of
democracy is to have the people¡¦s view directly and timely reflected in the
Government¡¦s decision-making process. And this development in the 1990s
represents a major step forward.
We then moved to a second phase of the modern democratic development, i.e., to
develop a system under which different political parties can compete with and
balance-out each other. The emergence of the DPP (Democratic Progressive Party)
signifies the beginning of a new era, in which the voters on the one hand
encouraged the continuing growth of the DPP while at the same time, they gave
the ruling KMT the necessary dominance to keep the stability.
In the year-2000 election, the voters decided that it was time to make a major
change but it seemed that the voters were not well-prepared for the instability
this would ensue, something that they did not foresee. The general feeling then
was that with the economic prosperity experienced in the last few decades,
Taiwan could afford changes that would lead to a more refined democracy where
political parties can take turns in governing the place. And through this
competition, the quality of democracy improved and the political process that a
modern society should possess could be developed.
Democracy in Action, from Post-2000 Presidential Election to Now
While the voters were expecting major reforms in
areas like social welfare, labor benefits, environmental concerns, social order,
as well as government organizations and due process in government
administration, they unfortunately, were not aware of the fact that our economy
was going to be faced with the structural adjustment problem and the start of
the world recession. At the same time, China quietly emerged as our competitor
in trade and investment.
When the current Administration first took office, it had in mine, the mandate
from the voters during the election. Therefore, it placed emphasis on welfare
payment, shorter working hours, environmental concerns, including re-assessing
the needs for the fourth nuclear plant. This requires the support of the
opposition parties, as the ruling DPP did not hold a majority at the
Legislature. It had to work with the opposition parties. Unfortunately, the
fierce competition amongst the three major presidential candidates of
approximately equal weight in the election resulted in a great deal of emotional
conflicts. This, together with the frustration of KMT supporters after losing
ruling power had made cooperation amongst the political parties particularly
difficult. There was no immediately available structure for the political
parties to interact in a constructive way, nor there existed a set of rules or
conducts. The constitutional issue, in terms of who has the primacy over the
organization of the cabinet, has emerged immediately after the election was
over. Therefore, with the sense of urgency on the part of the government to
implement reforms and to carryout the necessary changes, and the lack of
political structure and will to cooperate amongst the political parties, we were
destined for a politically chaotic situation.
A number of events have taken place thereafter which, in many people¡¦s view,
amounted to a series of political crisis. First, the controversy over the
suspension of the fourth nuclear plant project; second, the shortening of the
labor working hours; third, welfare payments for infants and the elderly; and
fourth, short-term measures to stimulate the economy, when it was falling into a
structural downturn, as well as a cyclical downturn. The accumulation of these
events reached a peak when the opposition launched a campaign on the recall
motion to remove President Chen from his presidency. On the side, there have
been continuous debates on how cross-strait relations should be dealt with.
Luckily, with the help of the international community, as well as the efforts
made by the government, the situation has been kept relatively stable; at least
not to the extent of complicating domestic politics.
I would say, this was a major challenge to our democracy. I would also say,
despite the dominance of the alliance of the opposition parties over the
legislative agenda, the democracy and the government still functioned, but not
with the kind of efficiency that we require to meet the challenges caused by
global changes. At the same time, there is undoubtedly, a great deal of emotion,
friction, misunderstanding, and mistrust. Situations may seem to be chaotic, but
fortunately, not to the extent of complete disorder. In this connection, I wish
to make a special tribute to the speaker of the Legislature, who was able to get
the legislative agenda moving by maintaining sufficient neutrality and
exercising his leadership. This is so, despite the fact that he is a member of
the KMT, and his loyalty to his political party is undoubted. The press, the
media, and the public helped to maintain balance in the process, and leaders of
the political parties, despite their differences, could still hold the lines.
Overall, we were able to maintain minimum order and stability, but this is not
enough for our process in moving towards a more efficient economy and refined
democracy.
In the process, we managed to resolve the nuclear plant issue by requesting the
intervention by the judiciary. The Grand Justices issued a very important
opinion, setting out the procedures and rules to guide the negotiated political
process which eventually led to the resumption of the nuclear plant project,
without causing major political impasse. The recall motion was diffused because
it was contrary to the expectation of the general public and the politicians had
to listen to what their electorates had to say. The labor issue and the social
welfare problems, and the short-term economic measures were all included in a
major effort to generate consensus, i.e., the EDAC (Economic Development
Advisory Conference) held in August this year. These are demonstrative of the
fact that the government, the political parties, and the general public do have
the will and the maturity to face the difficulties, but they have to learn how
to interact with each other. The process of learning is painful, costly, but I
hope this learning process has contributed to the further consolidation of our
democracy.
Results of December 1 Legislative Election and its Implications
I am most encouraged by the results of the election
yesterday. The voters have shown their maturity. In particular, it seemed to me
that they know what the problems are, who should be blamed and who should not be
blamed, and what can be blamed and what cannot be blamed. They also know what is
most needed, i.e., a political force that is strong enough to lead the process
of consolidating the political structure here. They seemed to favor the DPP in
leading the process by increasing the representation of the DPP in the
Legislature. The collective decision of the voters does make political sense, as
it is most efficient to have the process led by a party that could ensure better
coordination between the Legislature and the Administration. But the voters have
made sure that DPP¡¦s dominance will not cause abuse of power. This is because
the situation we are facing today is unprecedented, we cannot afford any major
political mistake or making decisions without the necessary political support;
therefore, any policy has to be carefully formulated and fully consulted. The
voters also gave the opposition parties sufficient seats to maintain a
meaningful balance of power. Of course, at this juncture, we cannot prejudge
what the likely composition of the next cabinet would be, but the voters
yesterday have actually told the politicians what their wishes are. The
politicians have to consider what would be best for maintaining sustainable
political stability here. This could mean the formation of a new political
alliance or cooperation amongst the political parties on an issue-specific
basis. In business and legal terms, we may be talking about mergers and
acquisitions, or cooperation on a contractual basis. The next few weeks will be
critical, but from the reaction of the major political parties yesterday, the
level of rationality and the political will to cooperate, have increased with
the results of the election, and I do hope this is a good starting point.
Future Agenda
Let me then spend a couple of minutes to give you a
list of items on our agenda for moving forward. First, we need to carryout a
number of political reforms; second, we need to deepen our internationalization
in every aspect of our society; and third, we need to maintain stability in
cross-strait relations and explore every possibility to improve the
relationship, to make the stability sustainable.
For domestic reform, first in the political area, we need to have a government
structure and a government process that will ensure that the government¡¦s
decisions are timely in meeting the pace of global changes, responsive to the
needs of businesses and fair to the society as a whole. In other words, we need
a democracy that is fair and efficient, with clearer division of power and
responsibility amongst different governmental institutions as well as between
central and local governments. Secondly, we need to develop a sounder legal
infrastructure to ensure that the dispute settlement is more efficient and less
costly, and government decisions are made timely, more predictable and
transparent, and most importantly, subject to challenges by the private parties.
Thirdly, we would need to reform and improve our government finance and the
associated tax systems, to ensure that the government has enough sources of
finance to carryout development projects as well as creating sufficient welfare
systems. Fourthly, we need to reshape our labor policy to cope with short-term
and structural unemployment problems and to make best use of our human resources
here; but at the same time, we need to maintain flexibility and reduce rigidity
in our labor market. Fifthly, we have to strengthen our industrial policies to
move our industries to a more advanced stage where we will be producing higher
quality and higher valued products. Sixthly, we need to reform our financial
systems, this would involve a re-structuring of the financial institutions to
improve their size and competitiveness, dealing with non-performing loans, and
improving our regulatory regimes. And, lastly, the most important item on the
domestic agenda is to improve the quality of the entire civil service.
On the aspect of deepening internationalization, Taiwan is not yet sufficiently
internationalized. Following our accession to the WTO, we will be opening-up our
market to foreign products and services, and at the same time, we will be
encouraging our firms to go international and to become internationally
competitive. This is the only way for an economy of our size to survive in the
fierce international competition ahead, and to avoid being marginalized in the
face of such competition.
On cross-strait relations, our policy goal is very clear, i.e., to maintain
peace and stability and not to be provocative. On the political side, we need to
generate domestic consensus on the cross-strait issues and on the other hand, we
need to sit down and talk with the other side to explore the possibility of
creating a new framework and/or making better use of the existing framework to
make the stability sustainable. As part of our exercise to maintain stability
and to direct the relationship towards creating mutual benefits, we have
established a rather complete and comprehensive plan for adjusting the trade and
economic policies. This would include a process of correcting what has been
accumulated in the past, and trying to reverse the trend of hollowing-out, as
well as to pursue proactive policies to make use of the market and resources in
China.
What I would like to add at this juncture is that democracy is not only an
essential element for maintaining domestic stability, it is also essential for
constructing long-term stability for cross-strait relations. In October 1998
when Mr. C.F. Koo, Chairman of the SEF (Straits Exchange Foundation) led a
delegation to China, during his meeting with President Jiang Zemin, he made it
very clear that the only path for both sides to move closer is for the Chinese
Mainland to expedite their democratization. If the Mainland Chinese Government
can introduce democracy into its regimes, the government¡¦s decisions are to be
constrained by their governmental systems, as well as laws, and monitored by the
people and the press; as a result, the decisions are going to be more rational
and the government is going to be one that is more responsible. It would then be
more comfortable for Taiwan and for the world at large to engage with China.
Conclusion
To conclude, I would like to re-iterate that I am
pleased to see the election results of yesterday, because they reflect the
maturity of the electorate; and we have seen politicians becoming more rational
and responsible. As a result, the prospect of political as well as economic
stability is much, much greater. The election yesterday also marked a major
advancement in our democratic process. With the renewed and re-enforced mandates
from the people, the DPP is to take the primary responsibility to work with
other political parties, to establish the structure and the rules for political
interactions, so as to facilitate the much needed reforms that I have just
presented. It is also necessary to work with the business community to identify
problems we need to address in our struggle to move our economy forward. The
ruling Government will also be responsible for organizing a cabinet as well as a
civil service that could effectively implement policies and plans on our agenda
for moving forward.